Among the urgent issues of today`s transnationalist agenda the problems colligate to the protection of environment are definitely one of the some visible ones . However , attempts to instate regulative environmental public policies at the same time create a lot of formal argument , be fuck off the scope of existing negative regularise of kind exercise on environment , and even the very position of such limit , is often disputed . Basically , the often across-the-board is the sp present of global economics subject to jurisprudence , the more(prenominal)(prenominal) problematic it becomes to find a consensus on the matter of performance of environmental public policies that would entreat immediate expenses . For example , when it was establish that the ozone depletion was primarily due to chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs ) gases their use was phased out under international agreement However , while these gases were widely industrially use such a relatively quick action was enabled by the introduction of avaiable substitutes for chlorofluorocarbons . Now , the problem of chlorofluorocarbons is quite petty in comparison with another human activity , namely the anxious of dodo fuels which leads to build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphither and which apparently has the largest influence on environment via global warming . But here the problem is much more acute as the around critical branches of global economics depend on dodo fuel , and attempts to rapidly shift to alternative technologies may and and so be very costly .
Still , I iron out that if the direct link between global warming and solvent negative environmental consequences is established , then economic cause of such disasters as devastation of New Orleans by hurricane Katrina , the economic cost of which according to some estimates could reach more than 100 billion (CNN 2005 , would justify all costs of environmental programs . And those who offer public policies directed not at the origin of the prime cause but only at the gross profit margin to the consiquences of environmental changes are short-sighted , as we can hardly be sure that in the future the situation will secernate worsening , so a massive amount of capital will have to be constantly spent for intrinsic adaptations , and any hope of achieveing global environmental sustainability will be lostReferencesKatrina could cost economy 100B . CNN , 02 September 2005 . 15 December 2005PAGEPAGE 1PAGE 1...If you req uire to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.