Sophocles' 'Oedipus The King' - Was Oedipus a victim of hubris or a victim of the gods?

The mess of Oedipus was bitter indeed. By the end of Oedipus the King, he and his sine qua non are elaten as Luckless (Ln 1195) and objects to envy non at completely (Ln 1196). But what was it that caused this gentleman to sleep with his mother and campaign his set about? What was it that Oedipus fell victim to? Was it the hubris that looked to so permeate his parting? Was he a puppet held in the cruel becharm of the gods? It would seem that perhaps it was neither of these and that rather these things combined unitedly as Oedipus fell victim to chance. If the fate of Oedipus was a penalty indeed it was a great integrity and therefore native corroborate been caused by a large sin. The largest sin we see in the play is obviously parricide and incest, which Dodds claims were the greatest a man toilet commit (Dodds). But this can not be what he was punished for as it was his punishment. The two can not be the same. Therefore another sin must be searched for and the o ne most commonly blamed is his hubris. The hubris of Oedipus is most homely in his dealings with Creon and the contrast that is later drawn surrounded by his own actions and those of Creon. Oedipus is certain that Creon has betrayed him and lied to him.

He ignores the innocent mans protests and he sentences Creon to death saying No, certainly; kill you, not discharge you. (Ln 625) This was a terrible thing to do, a decision get at rashly, a decision made with much hubris. The point is exclamatory all the more sharply when Creon later says, ...when I throw off knowledge I prefer not to speak at random. (Ln 154 6) A strong contrast is drawn between the...! If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay